Gov't censorship :the next big thing in US?

There are 2 articles in today's news that are clearly making the point that the US is beginning to overtly censor the citizens' speech via the internet and via cell phones. I am including quotes from those. Censorship until Obama became President was not acceptable to the US because of the First Amendment. Why would it be now? Read articles included as links please.

Quote:
"Shutting down social media is not the right choice, unless the government’s aim is to reinforce its already Draconian presence." ..."Worse still, it gives the impression that a government is willing to impede the communication of its entire populace in order to hinder the efforts of a select few." from article "Why blocking social media ...'
in Mashable on yahoo news today. 19-Aug-2011@12:28pm

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/08/protect-ip-act-would-cost-taxpayers-47-million-private-sector-much-more.ars/
with quotes:
"The Congressional Budget Office has released a new estimate of the cost of the PROTECT IP Act, the controversial legislation to force private ISPs, search engines, and other parties to censor websites accused of facilitating copyright infringement." +
..."We've never had the kind of large-scale Internet censorship infrastructure mandated by the PROTECT IP Act, so it's hard to predict how much it would cost private ISPs, search engines, and credit card networks to comply. But maintaining, updating, and enforcing blacklists could be expensive, and these costs would be multiplied across hundreds, if not thousands, of private firms."
I suspect this sort of event is precisely because of Obama's need to control/manipulate/usurp. Remember when he was first elected how he gave THE PRESS specific questions he wanted them to ask him? And remember how CNN.com reported that he planned to attack every government's computer, every private, and public computer , every hosting companies' computers and every business/corporate computer to get control of it? Don't be deceived by him. He is evil as defined by GOD because he championed sodomy that GOD called abomination in Leviticus 18:22; and because he has laid a plan to depopulate the nation by killing the unborn/preborn.
This blog started as a prolife blog and this issue is relevant because to publish the PROLIFE news involves overcoming illegal censorship by Obama and pervert segments of the nation.

Gloria Poole;@my apt in Missouri; 12:46pm;19-Aug-2011 @12:47pm;
Logged back in to add what I meant to include as more evidence of Obama administration censoring/controlling speech:
According to the BBC earlier today, the SEC on Obama's watch destroyed 9,000 files of citizen complaints about Bernie Madoff, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Bothers, AIG, Wells Fargo.,Bank of America, Deustche Bank, and SAC. That is typical for those in power who want a totalitarian government --they silence citizens' protest. But it was not acceptable in the US before, and with this post, I am saying it is not acceptable now either. Gloria Poole; @1:07pm;19-Aug-2011

If WSJ,NYT, & WashPost censor ur words, does = power?

I am adding this entry today to ask the question: if the Wall St Journal, the NY Times and the Washington Post all feel the need to censor via prior restraint a person's political and or religious speech, does that mean the person whom they squelch has POWER? That word power that is in the title of many books including one I was reading about today.
I think I am becoming the Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn of the US. I have been censored again today and this is documentation of it. Here's what happened.
Here's what I wrote that the WSJ censored/blocked from the comments page of an article written by Gary Hamel in the WSJ online that asked for/allowed public to comment, but censored my comments for ?? being Christian, or Prolife ??, or female ?? what? not sure, but read them for yourself:, quoting myself :
"I really loved this article. As a Registered Nurse, I had some so-called leadership roles that were paid jobs; and I had some teaching roles of [CPR,Infection Control/Prevention, etc] also in that capacity. And I have created blogs to teach the public in many areas. But what I have struggled to adapt to my life is the realities of acquiring power. I wrote down the key points of this article and the one I like most is "Pfeffer believes a meritorious cause can be a significant force multiplier". Well. I hope so! And my cause is saving the human race from premeditated destruction via abortuaries. If you want to know more about this and how I go about it, read some of my blogs, beginning with this one: http://prolife-nurse.blogspot.com; and also http://gloriapoole.blogspot.com, and also http://words-that-work-llp.blogspot.com. And those of you with power write me via direct messages or email to suggest how for me to get power or this cause . Gloria Poole, RN; licensed in Missouri, but writing,creating websites.blogging to save human life; and painting as artist.
+ and even though signed up and logged in as a "member" of their online community; blocked from page at:
http://blogs.wsj.com/management/2011/05/11/the-purpose-of-power/tab/comments;
my wsj profile at:
http://online.wsj.com/community/public/5c5b675f-42f0-43ce-aabf-64c789ae727a/" [end quote of myself that was added to the WSJ Editor's blog after Mr Hamel blocked it on his].
A reminder to the Wall Street Journal that for a company to solicit "public comments' on a public form so designated, and then censor with prior restraint the comments of an entire class of citizens [prolifers and or Christians] is illegal, violates the First Amendment civil liberties of citizens; and opens them to a lawsuit for violation of civil liberties. FYI, public notice and documentation of this event.
Gloria Poole,@ home in Missouri; 30_May-2011; 9:25am